Behind the Data
A Comparative Analysis of China’s Carbon Emission Data from Different Institutions
English, Chinese
JUL 2023
Report
Climate Governance Energy Transition Quantitative Modeling Tools
Summary:
This report offers a comparative analysis of the methodologies and results associated with the most recently released China carbon emissions data by ten domestic and foreign research institutions. This data was directly or indirectly calculated using official Chinese sources, and is timely, continuous, and consistent, allowing analysts to track, evaluate, forecast, and perform international comparisons of China’s carbon emissions.
This report focuses on energy-related CO2 emissions and includes the following features: 1) The analysis is based on the latest methodology and emissions data released by each institution as of the first quarter of 2023; 2) The analysis includes the carbon emissions databases released by domestic Chinese research institutions in recent years; 3) The report maps out energy data sources and relations between databases, and provides an analysis of differences in energy data accounting methods.
In addition, this report estimates China’s 2013-2021 annual serial baseline carbon emissions data based on official data and uses this as a benchmark to measure the gaps between the carbon emissions data of each institution and China’s official data. The report finds that the carbon emissions calculated in all databases are either directly or indirectly based on China's official energy statistics, but no organization currently has emission accounting boundaries that are fully consistent with official Chinese boundaries.
The report finds that when compared to China's official emission accounts, international research institutions generally report higher carbon emissions. These discrepancies in carbon emission data are primarily due to differences in accounting boundaries, emissions factors, accounting methods, energy data sources, sectoral divisions, fuel classifications, and calorific value used to convert fuel use to standard units.
Suggested citation:
Li Xindi, Yang Li. (2023). Behind the Data – A Comparative Analysis of China's Carbon Emission Data from Different Institutions. Beijing: Institute for Global Decarbonization Progress.
Related
-
China’s New Carbon-Intensity Measure Has Not Changed Its Climate PledgesExpanding carbon intensity to include industrial process emissions strengthens longer-term decarbonization, argue Hu Min, Li Xindi, and Yang Li.Op-ed AUG 2026
-
How Can the Oil and Gas Industry Navigate the “Deep Waters” of Green Transition?The Petroleum Business Daily conducted an exclusive interview with Yang Li and Liu Xueye, experts from the Institute for Green Innovation and Development (iGDP), to provide an in-depth analysis of the strategic restructuring and breakthrough strategies for the oil and gas industry during the 15th Five-Year Plan period.Interview AUG 2026
-
Decarbonizing Steel Industry Thermal SystemsThis report examines the low-carbon transition pathways for thermal/heating systems in China's steel industry, reviewing the policy drivers behind decarbonization and analyzing the technological trajectory across near-, medium-, and long-term horizons (2025–2060). It surveys and compares the applicability, economics, and emissions-reduction potential of key technologies—including waste heat recovery, system efficiency improvements, and hydrogen-based metallurgy—through in-depth case studies (HBIS Group's hydrogen metallurgy, Shougang Jingtang's process interface optimization, and Sinosteel/CISP's hydrogen-based smelting reduction, among others). It further identifies the practical barriers to scaling these technologies (high green hydrogen costs, renewable energy intermittency, stranded-asset risk, and weak cross-sector coordination mechanisms), and proposes policy recommendations to accelerate the sector's shift toward integration with renewable energy systems.Report AUG 2026
-
Can China’s zero-carbon industrial parks go global?In March 2026, China’s 15th Five Year Plan set a target to build “around 100 national level zero-carbon industrial parks” – zones for industrial production with net-zero or close to zero carbon emissions. It marked an upgrade to what had previously been a series of pilot projects around the country and catapulted such zones to a national priority.Interview JUL 2026
-
Green Power Consumption Faces New ChallengesWith the rapid growth in installed capacity, the core challenge facing the power system is shifting from “whether we can generate more green electricity” to “whether we can effectively utilize green electricity at the right time and place.”Interview JUL 2026
-
In-Depth: China’s New Energy Sector Moves Beyond “Scale Worship”On July 23, the National Development and Reform Commission and the National Energy Administration released the “15th Five-Year Plan for Renewable Energy Development” (hereinafter referred to as the “Plan”), which sets out a systematic roadmap for the development of renewable energy over the next five years.Interview JUL 2026
